Thursday, June 7, 2007

Mother Theresa A Fraud?

Greg's Thoughts: I was sent this email by a former Catholic Nun about millions of dollars collected by Mother Teresa's Ministry. According to the former Catholic Sister, the money never gets to the poor. This is just another example of Vatican evil. Remember, the Vatican is a driving force behind the NWO and the complete takeover of a free America.

From Susan Shields:

Some years after I became a Catholic, I joined Mother Teresa's congregation, the Missionaries of Charity. I was one of her sisters for nine and a half years, living in the Bronx, Rome, and San Franciso, until I became disillusioned and left in May 1989. As I reentered the world, I slowly began to unravel the tangle of lies in which I had lived. I wondered how I could have believed them for so long.
Three of Mother Teresa's teachings that are fundamental to her religious congregation are all the more dangerous because they are believed so sincerely by her sisters. Most basic is the belief that as long as a sister obeys she is doing God's will. Another is the belief that the sisters have leverage over God by choosing to suffer. Their suffering makes God very happy. He then dispenses more graces to humanity. The third is the belief that any attachment to human beings, even the poor being served, supposedly interferes with love of God and must be vigilantly avoided or immediately uprooted. The efforts to prevent any attachments cause continual chaos and confusion, movement and change in the congregation. Mother Teresa did not invent these beliefs - they were prevalent in religious congregations before Vatican II - but she did everything in her power (which was great) to enforce them.
Once a sister has accepted these fallacies she will do almost anything. She can allow her health to be destroyed, neglect those she vowed to serve, and switch off her feelings and independent thought. She can turn a blind eye to suffering, inform on her fellow sisters, tell lies with ease, and ignore public laws and regulations.
\n\u003cp\>Women from many nations joined Mother Teresa in the expectation that they \nwould help the poor and come closer to God themselves. When I left, there were \nmore than 3,000 sisters in approximately 400 houses scattered throughout the \nworld. Many of these sisters who trusted Mother Teresa to guide them have become \nbroken people. In the face of overwhelming evidence, some of them have finally \nadmitted that their trust has been betrayed, that God could not possibly be \ngiving the orders they hear. It is difficult for them to decide to leave - their \nself-confidence has been destroyed, and they have no education beyond what they \nbrought with them when they joined. I was one of the lucky ones who mustered \nenough courage to walk away. \u003c/p\>\n\u003cp\>It is in the hope that others may see the fallacy of this purported way to \nholiness that I tell a little of what I know. Although there are relatively few \ntempted to join Mother Teresa's congregation of sisters, there are many who \ngenerously have supported her work because they do not realize how her twisted \npremises strangle efforts to alleviate misery. Unaware that most of the \ndonations sit unused in her bank accounts, they too are deceived into thinking \nthey are helping the poor. \u003c/p\>\n\u003cp\>As a Missionary of Charity, I was assigned to record donations and write the \nthank-you letters. The money arrived at a frantic rate. The mail carrier often \ndelivered the letters in sacks. We wrote receipts for checks of $50,000 and more \non a regular basis. Sometimes a donor would call up and ask if we had received \nhis check, expecting us to remember it readily because it was so large. How \ncould we say that we could not recall it because we had received so many that \nwere even larger? \u003c/p\>\n\u003cp\>When Mother spoke publicly, she never asked for money, but she did encourage \npeople to make sacrifices for the poor, to "give until it hurts." Many people \ndid - and they gave it to her. We received touching letters from people, \nsometimes apparently poor themselves, who were making sacrifices to send us a \nlittle money for the starving people in Africa, the flood victims in Bangladesh, \nor the poor children in India. Most of the money sat in our bank accounts. ",1]
);
//-->

Women from many nations joined Mother Teresa in the expectation that they would help the poor and come closer to God themselves. When I left, there were more than 3,000 sisters in approximately 400 houses scattered throughout the world. Many of these sisters who trusted Mother Teresa to guide them have become broken people. In the face of overwhelming evidence, some of them have finally admitted that their trust has been betrayed, that God could not possibly be giving the orders they hear. It is difficult for them to decide to leave - their self-confidence has been destroyed, and they have no education beyond what they brought with them when they joined. I was one of the lucky ones who mustered enough courage to walk away.
It is in the hope that others may see the fallacy of this purported way to holiness that I tell a little of what I know. Although there are relatively few tempted to join Mother Teresa's congregation of sisters, there are many who generously have supported her work because they do not realize how her twisted premises strangle efforts to alleviate misery. Unaware that most of the donations sit unused in her bank accounts, they too are deceived into thinking they are helping the poor.
As a Missionary of Charity, I was assigned to record donations and write the thank-you letters. The money arrived at a frantic rate. The mail carrier often delivered the letters in sacks. We wrote receipts for checks of $50,000 and more on a regular basis. Sometimes a donor would call up and ask if we had received his check, expecting us to remember it readily because it was so large. How could we say that we could not recall it because we had received so many that were even larger?
When Mother spoke publicly, she never asked for money, but she did encourage people to make sacrifices for the poor, to "give until it hurts." Many people did - and they gave it to her. We received touching letters from people, sometimes apparently poor themselves, who were making sacrifices to send us a little money for the starving people in Africa, the flood victims in Bangladesh, or the poor children in India. Most of the money sat in our bank accounts.
\n\u003cp\>The flood of donations was considered to be a sign of God's approval of \nMother Teresa's congregation. We were told by our superiors that we received \nmore gifts than other religious congregations because God was pleased with \nMother, and because the Missionaries of Charity were the sisters who were \nfaithful to the true spirit of religious life. \u003c/p\>\n\u003cp\>Most of the sisters had no idea how much money the congregation was amassing. \nAfter all, we were taught not to collect anything. One summer the sisters living \non the outskirts of Rome were given more crates of tomatoes than they could \ndistribute. None of their neighbors wanted them because the crop had been so \nprolific that year. The sisters decided to can the tomatoes rather than let them \nspoil, but when Mother found out what they had done she was very displeased. \nStoring things showed lack of trust in Divine Providence. \u003c/p\>\n\u003cp\>The donations rolled in and were deposited in the bank, but they had no \neffect on our ascetic lives and very little effect on the lives of the poor we \nwere trying to help. We lived a simple life, bare of all superfluities. We had \nthree sets of clothes, which we mended until the material was too rotten to \npatch anymore. We washed our own clothes by hand. The never-ending piles of \nsheets and towels from our night shelter for the homeless we washed by hand, \ntoo. Our bathing was accomplished with only one bucket of water. Dental and \nmedical checkups were seen as an unnecessary luxury. \u003c/p\>\n\u003cp\>Mother was very concerned that we preserve our spirit of poverty. Spending \nmoney would destroy that poverty. She seemed obsessed with using only the \nsimplest of means for our work. Was this in the best interests of the people we \nwere trying to help, or were we in fact using them as a tool to advance our own \n"sanctity?" In Haiti, to keep the spirit of poverty, the sisters reused needles \nuntil they became blunt. Seeing the pain caused by the blunt needles, some of \nthe volunteers offered to procure more needles, but the sisters refused. ",1]
);
//-->

The flood of donations was considered to be a sign of God's approval of Mother Teresa's congregation. We were told by our superiors that we received more gifts than other religious congregations because God was pleased with Mother, and because the Missionaries of Charity were the sisters who were faithful to the true spirit of religious life.
Most of the sisters had no idea how much money the congregation was amassing. After all, we were taught not to collect anything. One summer the sisters living on the outskirts of Rome were given more crates of tomatoes than they could distribute. None of their neighbors wanted them because the crop had been so prolific that year. The sisters decided to can the tomatoes rather than let them spoil, but when Mother found out what they had done she was very displeased. Storing things showed lack of trust in Divine Providence.
The donations rolled in and were deposited in the bank, but they had no effect on our ascetic lives and very little effect on the lives of the poor we were trying to help. We lived a simple life, bare of all superfluities. We had three sets of clothes, which we mended until the material was too rotten to patch anymore. We washed our own clothes by hand. The never-ending piles of sheets and towels from our night shelter for the homeless we washed by hand, too. Our bathing was accomplished with only one bucket of water. Dental and medical checkups were seen as an unnecessary luxury.
Mother was very concerned that we preserve our spirit of poverty. Spending money would destroy that poverty. She seemed obsessed with using only the simplest of means for our work. Was this in the best interests of the people we were trying to help, or were we in fact using them as a tool to advance our own "sanctity?" In Haiti, to keep the spirit of poverty, the sisters reused needles until they became blunt. Seeing the pain caused by the blunt needles, some of the volunteers offered to procure more needles, but the sisters refused.
\n\u003cp\>We begged for food and supplies from local merchants as though we had no \nresources. On one of the rare occasions when we ran out of donated bread, we \nwent begging at the local store. When our request was turned down, our superior \ndecreed that the soup kitchen could do without bread for the day. \u003c/p\>\n\u003cp\>It was not only merchants who were offered a chance to be generous. Airlines \nwere requested to fly sisters and air cargo free of charge. Hospitals and \ndoctors were expected to absorb the costs of medical treatment for the sisters \nor to draw on funds designated for the religious. Workmen were encouraged to \nlabor without payment or at reduced rates. We relied heavily on volunteers who \nworked long hours in our soup kitchens, shelters, and day camps. \u003c/p\>\n\u003cp\>A hard-working farmer devoted many of his waking hours to collecting and \ndelivering food for our soup kitchens and shelters. "If I didn't come, what \nwould you eat?" he asked. \u003c/p\>\n\u003cp\>Our Constitution forbade us to beg for more than we needed, but, when it came \nto begging, the millions of dollars accumulating in the bank were treated as if \nthey did not exist. \u003c/p\>\n\u003cp\>For years I had to write thousands of letters to donors, telling them that \ntheir entire gift would be used to bring God's loving compassion to the poorest \nof the poor. I was able to keep my complaining conscience in check because we \nhad been taught that the Holy Spirit was guiding Mother. To doubt her was a sign \nthat we were lacking in trust and, even worse, guilty of the sin of pride. I \nshelved my objections and hoped that one day I would understand why Mother \nwanted to gather so much money, when she herself had taught us that even storing \ntomato sauce showed lack of trust in Divine Providence. \u003c/p\>\n\u003chr\>\n\u003ca href\u003d\"http://www.holysmoke.org/sdhok/mt.htm\" target\u003d\"_blank\" onclick\u003d\"return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)\"\>\u003cimg height\u003d\"22\" hspace\u003d\"8\" width\u003d\"20\" align\u003d\"middle\" vspace\u003d\"4\" border\u003d\"0\"\>Go Back\u003c/a\> to Shy David's "Mother Teresa" Page. \n",1]
);
//-->

We begged for food and supplies from local merchants as though we had no resources. On one of the rare occasions when we ran out of donated bread, we went begging at the local store. When our request was turned down, our superior decreed that the soup kitchen could do without bread for the day.
It was not only merchants who were offered a chance to be generous. Airlines were requested to fly sisters and air cargo free of charge. Hospitals and doctors were expected to absorb the costs of medical treatment for the sisters or to draw on funds designated for the religious. Workmen were encouraged to labor without payment or at reduced rates. We relied heavily on volunteers who worked long hours in our soup kitchens, shelters, and day camps.
A hard-working farmer devoted many of his waking hours to collecting and delivering food for our soup kitchens and shelters. "If I didn't come, what would you eat?" he asked.
Our Constitution forbade us to beg for more than we needed, but, when it came to begging, the millions of dollars accumulating in the bank were treated as if they did not exist.
For years I had to write thousands of letters to donors, telling them that their entire gift would be used to bring God's loving compassion to the poorest of the poor. I was able to keep my complaining conscience in check because we had been taught that the Holy Spirit was guiding Mother. To doubt her was a sign that we were lacking in trust and, even worse, guilty of the sin of pride. I shelved my objections and hoped that one day I would understand why Mother wanted to gather so much money, when she herself had taught us that even storing tomato sauce showed lack of trust in Divine Providence.

3 comments:

aveocruxunicaspes said...

dear Greg. this story on Mo Theresa really does displease me. one day I will write regarding Sr charlotte which also raised my shackles. but for now Mo theresa...
does anybody really bother to verify these stories? much is made of the poverty of the order, which Mo theresa famously worked to protect. she is not the first. after all this life of poverty comes from the gospel, the exhrtation of Jesus to the apostles no less. and those who choose to bear christs cross in the radical way that he demonstrated surely do not warrant snide criticism.

Dionne Sabbay Thompson said...

Hello,
I enoyed the interview with Bill Hughes, author of Secret Terrorists. I am a writer who has been trying to edify the populous about the Jesuit Order and NWO. I recently wrote a few articles on this issue, linked to the ForthComing Mark of the Beast, Enforced National Sunday Law.

Sabbay
AdventistWheat.com

truthrestored said...

What can be said, but that the masses are lied to as evidenced by Mother Theresa. Jesus' Uncle was Joseph of Aramathea, the richest Jew of Rome and Minister of Mines for the Roman Empire. Even the MYTH of poverty and celibacy of Christ put forth by the history controllers has fooled the masses of today. What a blessing is the "shouting from the rooftops" of truth as Isaiah's words are fulfilled by the Internet.
The Mormon/LDS church leaders are also false "prophet and apostles" as True Ott discloses and many others who know the lies, thefts, and even murders ("heart attacks", "accidents", etc.)the the leaders of the LDS Church order. Its all about greed, control, and power. So this story on Mo Theresa doesn't surprise me. After all we have the exposed generations of sexual abuse of children that the Catholic leaders knew about and allowed at the very least.